6 Unique Online Fundraising Techniques for Your Nonprofit (Part 1 of 6)

Lori Halley 16 October 2007 5 comments

This post has been contributed by Lance Trebesch and Taylor Robinson from TicketPrinting.com 

(Updated on 19/10/07 to address comments below)

Overview

Every nonprofit knows that fundraisers are critical to their existence.  Without donations, no resources are available to support the primary cause or purpose of the organization.  While most traditional media channels have been exhausted, new opportunities have arisen in the online sector.  By tapping into cutting-edge online resources, your organization can achieve fundraising objectives that far exceed established boundaries.  But what are these mysterious online tools and how do you put them to work for your organization?  This series attempts to answer these questions and more by breaking down the vast online resources into six manageable categories.  These categories include:

  1. Social Networking
  2. Online Auctions
  3. Email Campaign
  4. Wiki Pages and Event Calendars
  5. Blogs
  6. Online Raffles

1.  Social Networking

Social Networking is a broad term that describes online communities who share common friends, interests, goals, etc.  Why are they so important to nonprofit organizations? “As a [social network] user, you get notified when your friends start using an application; you can then start using that same application with one click.  At which point, all of your friends become aware that you have started using that application and the cycle continues.  The result is that a successful application on Facebook (a social network) can grow to a million users or more within a couple of weeks of creation” (Marc Andreessen).  The translation of this excerpt to your nonprofit is that social networking platforms facilitate unmatched viral fundraising possibilities.  The list below gives a summary of the unique characteristics of some of the most important social networking sites.

MySpace- This is the largest of all social networks on the web.  According to Alexa, a web information company, MySpace is the 3rd most visited site in the United States.  MySpace users communicate on blogs and forums, share pictures and videos, and create groups based on common interests.  As of July 23rd 2007, there were 19,950 Non-Profit and Philanthropic groups on the website.

Facebook- Facebook, the sixth most visited site on the internet, has more than 48 million active users.  The company projects 60 million active users by the end of 2007.(Facebook.com)  Facebook presents the opportunity to communicate to large groups interested in supporting your cause.  By creating or joining groups focused on social change, you can easily and efficiently reach new supporters, donors, and volunteers for your organization.  After establishing relationships with new supporters, Facebook’s “Newsfeed” allows you to easily stay in touch with them.

Facebook was initially available exclusively to college students.  Because of this, Facebook is a great way to reach younger demographics, as 30.8% of its visitors are between the ages of 18 and 24.(Fabernovel Consulting)  But in-spite of these early attributes, Facebook is quickly becoming an outlet for effectively connecting with any age group.  As of May 2007, 40.9% of Facebook users were 35 and above.(Fabernovel Consulting)  Neilson Net Ratings reported that 34% work as professionals, executives, sales, educational, or technical.  User demographics are anticipated to be changing rapidly in the next 12 to 18 months. Facebook has projected that 75% of worldwide users will be out of college.  (Slideshare.com)

Care2- Care2 has approximately 7 million members and is specifically focused on community activism.  Human rights groups, environmental groups, etc. are found on this networking site.  Blogs, forums, and pictures are all used to connect users.  Additional features include the ability to create and sign petitions on the website (techsoup) and submit these petitions to lawmakers.

Squidoo- Squidoo is a network that is designed for individuals or organizations to effectively communicate their area(s) of expertise.  The site allows users to create “lenses” which are a single page describing the topic of focus.  Unlike MySpace or Facebook, Squidoo is focused on providing a springboard or directory of content on the web.  For example, a nonprofit might create a page about their cause/purpose on a lens.  The lens would have some useful information on it as well as links to other online resources which have further reading on the subject.  The website also contributes a significant portion of their revenue back to nonprofits and the lens creators (who themselves are often nonprofits).

Profile- The best way to get started on one of the networking sites is to create a profile for your organization.  You have two options for how to do this.

  • Company Profile- This is a more conservative and professional approach where the organization creates a profile and outright states its business purpose.
  • Personal Profile- This is when a representative in the organization sets up a personal profile to speak on behalf of the company.  This will have his/her picture friends etc. and will be less commercial in feeling. There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches and ultimately your organization will have to decide (or do both).  However, it is important to understand that implementing a successful profile of any sort requires a continual intensive effort.  The organization will need to update the profile regularly, add new announcements, comments, and friends and overall be involved in the community.  Many nonprofits have made the mistake of setting up a profile and then never updating it or getting involved.  You cannot simply display your cause and expect to be successful; creating personal relationships and online contacts is required.  Marc Ruben’s “10 Commandments of MySpace Advocacy” is an excellent resource for how to maintain a successful profile.

Groups- Community organizations must become familiar with established groups that are focused on their cause and sign up to become members.  This will connect the organization to a network of resources and possible fundraising supporters.  For example, an environmental nonprofit may be interested in joining a group such as “I’m Going Green,” which currently has 9,155 members (The Huffington Post).

Charity Badge- Now that you have an idea what social networks are and what different platforms are available, you will need to learn how to use them to raise money for your organization.  Keep in mind that unlike other online fundraising channels such as a raffle or auction, the primary role of social networks should be to create awareness and community around your group and the fundraising aspect should be secondary.  Creating a charity badge is an easy and effective way to spread the word about your organization and receive donations that extend beyond your geographic constraints’.  A charity badge is a small widget often including a picture, brief description of the organization, and link to where you can make a donation.  They are valuable on social networking sites because they can be easily duplicated and shared between friends with common interests.  Charity badge creators include ChipIn, Network for Good, and CareBadges.  

(ED: More information on charity badges is coming up later on - “Charity Badges to Raise Dough?” and “7 Tips to Make Your Charity Badge a Success.”)

Get a Special Report on Simplifying Membership Management

Enter your email and receive this special report in your inbox.
Lori Halley [Engaging Apricot] Lori Halley [Engaging Apricot]

Posted by Lori Halley [Engaging Apricot]

Published Tuesday, 16 October 2007 at 6:31 PM

Get a Special Report on Simplifying Membership Management

Enter your email and receive this special report in your inbox.

Comments

  • Mark Brown said:

    Thursday, 18 October 2007 at 12:39 PM

    This blog post is very sloppy. The Facebook section: To reference wikipedia is strange,  is this the most credible source you can find?  

    It states, "“According to TechCrunch, "about 85%.." I followed the Techcrunch link to see the source of the quote and it took me to a short wikipedia entry on TechCrunch with no mention of the quote.  

    Staying with the Facebook section, the comments regarding the demographic situation are out of date and misleading.  According to Charlene Li of Forrester Research (As at the 8th of October 2007) there are 44 million active users presently and 60 million projected by end of 2007.  It states that 'Facebook also projects that 75% of worldwide users will be outside of college.'  Of the US demographics,only 12% are full time students, with some 34% working as 'professionals, executives, sales, education, or technical."  According to Forrester's research, 45% of users worldwide are 35+.  (See charlene li on slideshare )

    As an active user of Facebook and other such Social Media apps, and being 35yrs old and a Chief Exec of a not for profit, I see huge potential with Social Media/Web 2.0  But like any new emerging technology we cannot simply transplant our present strategies and approaches onto the new methods.  We need to tweek and change.  With Social Media/Web 2.0 the key as I see interaction as a 'conversation.'  You don't advertise or plug a cause, you engage in a conversation.  Action has to be birthed out of a community, a social network.  A little like sitting in a room with complete strangers and immediately expecting them to leap to action when you ask them to get involved in your organisation vs taking the time to get to know them, understand their passions and interests and gaining genuine respect for them, then in a more natural way, inviting them to be involved.

    This post modern generation expects a voice.

    Mark Brown

  • Lori Halley [Engaging Apricot] Lori Halley [Engaging Apricot]

    Lori Halley [Engaging Apricot] said:

    Thursday, 18 October 2007 at 1:57 PM

    Mark, thanks for your comment and feedback about Facebook. We're going to look into this and get back to you soon.

  • Colt Lapham said:

    Friday, 19 October 2007 at 11:07 AM

    Mark, thanks for catching this inaccuracy.  The statistics were certainly out of date, and I have since read a couple of articles concerning Wikipedia's misreprentation of current Facebook demographics.  I re-wrote this section of the post, and it should be up soon.

  • Wild Apricot Blog said:

    Tuesday, 13 November 2007 at 6:48 AM

    These were the most popular posts in Oct 2007 according to Google Analytics: 8 Ideas To Promote Your

  • Wild Apricot Blog said:

    Tuesday, 13 November 2007 at 6:48 AM

    These were the most popular posts in Oct 2007 according to Google Analytics: 8 Ideas To Promote Your

Sorry, this blog post is closed for further comments.